Writing About Writing is maintained by one person (and one very part-time assistant), and is a labor of love and a small effort to help promote a writing career. I love hearing from my readers, getting feedback, and answering exciting questions. (Indeed, I have a whole segment on the blog dedicated to answering questions.)M likes Now used by tens of thousands of students, Writing about Writing presents accessible writing studies research by authors such as Mike Rose, Deborah Brandt, John Swales, and Nancy Sommers, together with popular texts by authors such as Malcolm X and Anne Lamott, and texts from student writers. Throughout the book, friendly explanations and scaffolded activities and 4/5() Since its initial publication, Writing about Writing has empowered tens of thousands of students to investigate assumptions about writing and to explore how writing works. It does so by making writing itself the subject of inquiry.4/5()
Writing about Writing - Wikipedia
It's my birthday today, so I'm going to drop a reminder and run. And if you want to help me get a gift, my writing about writing jar is always open. This is your absolutely last chance to drop a recommendation for best stand alone classic science fiction books—so not a part of a series or a book with a sequel. Plus the recommendation that folks have already dropped need your seconds and thirds and fourths.
We'll be posting results soon. Just don't forget to pop over to the ORIGINAL PAGE to drop that recommendation or check out the rules if you're unsure of them. If you put it here or on the social media pages where I'm sharing this link, it won't get tabulated and put on our list. Also please keep in mind that we already ran a "could stand alone but doesn't" poll for science fiction.
A few of our recommendations have sequels or are part of series, and even though they might have been written decades later, they disqualify the books from THIS particular conversation.
Thank you all for joining in our Book Rec Conversation. I've really love reading all your comments about the books you treasure and why. Can writers make sexy villains without having them redeem themselves? Check out today's guest blog from Savannah Cordova. Everyone loves a bad boy. And why in the world do we devote so much time to this subject? Because of fictional villains — specifically, the oh-so-sexy villains we love to hate, but just as often seem to genuinely love.
This was when I began writing about character development and dynamics on a regular basis, as well as engaging with more media analysis overall, writing about writing. In that time, hoo boy, writing about writing, have Writing about writing seen some things re: Villain Discourse.
When a character has a romantic relationship or even just chemistry with a villain, what makes that relationship too toxic to abide? Despite my eye-rolling at those who claim that shipping unhealthy fictional relationships is equivalent to endorsing them in real life, I do think the answer to the last question is yes.
Failing that, how much redemptive potential do they need to cross that threshold? And finally, if a villain is given a strong redemption arc — potentially even going all the way from antagonist to deuteragonist — does that make them sexier? Attractive white women are starting to get more sexy villain rep — Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn, Emma Stone as Cruella de Vil — but with the enormous caveats that a sexualizing women is a much more systematically oppressive, socially gross practice than sexualizing men [ as we all know ], and b that these characters, if not quite good, do typically get more sympathetic explanations for their behavior than their male counterparts.
So for our purposes — because, sadly, there are limited examples of both sexy and immoral female villains, POC villains, and less-than-conventionally-attractive villains, and because the issues around them are weightier and not something I feel as qualified to talk about — this article refers mainly to the villains that dominate fandom discussions today.
That said, I do hope to someday live in a world where more villains are considered sexy and evil regardless of demographics. But plot twist: there are two elephants in this sexy villain room! Kylo Ren, the bane of my pop cultural existence, is perfectly emblematic of this problem. Serious Star Wars spoilers ahead! The Star Wars fans do, though — and they overwhelmingly ship Kylo Ren with Rey played by Daisy Ridleydespite their hostile and even occasionally abusive relationship, writing about writing.
I know, I know. Kylo renounces the dark side and helps Rey at the end of Rise of Skywalker — just in time to plant one on her blech and die cinematically in the rain. Critic Kayti Burt explains this much more eloquently than I dobut basically, Kylo Ren barely does any self-reflection or experiences any genuine remorse. For context, writing about writing, today there are around 16,… so if anything, fans found him sexier and more shippable before his redemption.
Fans loved him, wanted him, writing about writing shipped him unabashedly anyway. Kylo Ren, and villains like him — those who receive the hasty, bare-minimum morality treatment — are an affront to the craft of storytelling. I suppose I like to think that the combination of war-criminal-level degeneracy and a poorly executed redemption arc would preclude other readers and viewers, as it does me, from ever being able to find a villain particularly attractive.
You know, sort of like how the ridiculous and abusive dynamics in Fifty Shades of Gray make it tough to get on board with Christian. Alas, this is not reality. But at the same time, I want readers and viewers to hold creators to higher standards — and it might seem silly, but finding weakly developed villains hot and enthusiastically shipping them does lend implicit approval to those stories and characters.
To jog your memory, that one was: even if not a prerequisite for sexiness, writing about writing, does a redemption arc still make a character sexier?
The answer here, I think, is a tentative yes. Certainly, I could have scrounged around a bit more writing about writing come up with a decent redemption arc belonging to a canonical adult character. Living writing about writing harder. This is harder to evaluate than with other characters because a canon Zuko is younger than most villains albeit much older-looking than baby-faced Aang writing about writing, which makes people rightfully!
And how they perceive them is, essentially, as sexy. TL;DR, lots of people are attracted to irredeemable villains, writing about writing. Plenty of villains these days have sympathetic aspects to them: a rough childhood, an understandable objective taken too far, or some other trauma that drove them to the place they are now.
In her spare time, she enjoys reading contemporary fiction, writing short stories, and marathoning ATLA. If you would like to writing about writing blog for Writing About Writing, we would love to have an excuse to take a day off a wonderful diaspora of voices, writing about writing.
Take a look at our guest post guidelines, writing about writing, and drop me a line at chris.
brecheen gmail. If you writing about writing paying really close attention, you may have even noticed it go live and then get taken back down because it was such a mess.
I'll have to do it by hand, but I won't have a chance to get it fixed and posted until after the window of maximum engagement. Most of my readers are still in North Writing about writing, and the east coast starts logging off for the weekend pretty early, writing about writing. So in order to give this post as much oxygen as it deserves, I'm going to do the work today but post the post on Monday my usual day off next week.
What is the best stand alone Classic Science Fiction Book published before ? I'll be dropping the original page rerun over on WAW's Writing about writing page but for everyone else, here is a quick update post. If you haven't yet, please don't forget to pop over to the original page to drop that nomination, writing about writing, see what has been nominated already, second all those you writing about writing with, writing about writing, as well as brush up on the rules—there are a FEW after all.
We're looking for Classic science writing about writing this time around, so there really ought writing about writing be a LOT of stand alone books. After all, the trend towards sequels didn't start afterbut it certainly wasn't as prevalent before. Plus…all the foundation literature that people rend their garments about is from prior to Again, please remember to go to the original page to drop your nomination and familiarize yourself with the rules if you haven't yet.
If you put it anywhere else including a Facebook comment on this post it will not be counted. Writing about writing My drug of choice is writing——writing, art, reading, writing about writing, inspiration, books, creativity, process, craft, blogging, grammar, linguistics, and did I writing about writing writing?
Pages Home Peeps Business Crap F. The Best of W. Follow W. Facebook Links The Reliquary Guest Appearances. Wednesday, October 6, A Writing about writing Off Kilter. at October 06, No comments: Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. Friday, October 1, NWAW Update. If you're getting updates from Writing About Writing through email or direct notifications, instead of social media, today I did a post on NOT Writing About Writing about my recent move.
at October 01, No comments: Email This BlogThis! Thursday, writing about writing, September 30, Disregarding Grammar? com with the subject line "W. My comment policy also may mean one of your comments ends up in the mailbox. I'll even tackle tough questions like what prescriptive grammar and racism have in common.
Just a note before I jump into this question. My queue of questions isn't EMPTY, but I can kind of "see the bottom," and like a cat, I'm absolutely sure that this means I will soon run out and perish. So if you've got questions for me, now's a good time to send them. Oh wait. Is it the fact that I refuse to be an elitist shitgibbon about mocking memes with typos or people who use non-standard grammar?
That I writing about writing out that prescriptive grammar fits into an invisible system that reinforces a colonial hierarchy of English in which there is one "best" form of English—that literally comes from the same place that started all those colonies—and any non-standard grammar particularly if used by people of color is considered to simply be flawed or "wrong" even though it follows linguistic rules and has a system writing about writing grammar just like any language or dialect?
And that I point out that what is right or not is usually both enforced by people in power as well as becoming one of the ways they maintain that power? Because at least one of those, I'm probably not going to apologize for. Ironically, most people don't actually know the best form of English, or at what point in time they would like to "freeze" the inexorable march of linguistic drift. Everything that changed in English before that is 'Duh, of course language changes and evolves, writing about writing.
Actually having a metric for embracing new grammar guidelines and rejecting others would be complicated and would require some sort of forethought and conscious standard rather than just a snap judgement and feeling of superiority. They probably "salad-bar" the rules, taking what they like and deeming the rest to be the work of knaves.
Mostly they just go by what they were indoctrinated with during high school and consider everything else to be a mistake of some level or another. Perhaps worst of all and most ironic? is that this strict adherence to some grammar rules they locked in when they were teen-agers does absolutely nothing to enhance comprehension. They correct perfectly clear meanings and assume incompetence or stupidity, rather than ask for clarification, when meanings are unclear.
Like most rules imposed by the ruling elite, they are only there to use as a cudgel to prove how backwards the people are who get them wrong. You're not going to listen to THEM about privilege and marginalization, are you? Not when they end sentences with prepositions and their grammar—IF YOU COULD EVEN CALL IT THAT— uses a copula deletion of the verb 'to be'.
And through it all, people never seem to notice that they are falling into one of two traps. EITHER they are pulling the "My way of doing the religion is the only right way" move of thinking American writing about writing British or Australian or….
The WORST Amateur Writing Mistakes - 22 Novice Writer Issues
, time: 37:26Writing About Writing (And Occasionally Some Writing)
Dec 28, · Writing about Writing: A College Reader. When Doug Downs and Elizabeth Wardle published their article “Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions” in June , they challenged the field to imagine a new approach to first-year composition/5 Writing About Writing is maintained by one person (and one very part-time assistant), and is a labor of love and a small effort to help promote a writing career. I love hearing from my readers, getting feedback, and answering exciting questions. (Indeed, I have a whole segment on the blog dedicated to answering questions.)M likes Since its initial publication, Writing about Writing has empowered tens of thousands of students to investigate assumptions about writing and to explore how writing works. It does so by making writing itself the subject of inquiry.4/5()
No comments:
Post a Comment